Proceedings:
No. 1: Thirty-First AAAI Conference On Artificial Intelligence
Volume
Issue:
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 31
Track:
AAAI Technical Track: Game Theory and Economic Paradigms
Downloads:
Abstract:
Nowadays, several crowdsourcing projects exploit social choice methods for computing an aggregate ranking of alternatives given individual rankings provided by workers. Motivated by such systems, we consider a setting where each worker is asked to rank a fixed (small) number of alternatives and, then, a positional scoring rule is used to compute the aggregate ranking. Among the apparently infinite such rules, what is the best one to use? To answer this question, we assume that we have partial access to an underlying true ranking. Then, the important optimization problem to be solved is to compute the positional scoring rule whose outcome, when applied to the profile of individual rankings, is as close as possible to the part of the underlying true ranking we know. We study this fundamental problem from a theoretical point of view and present positive and negative complexity results. Furthermore, we complement our theoretical findings with experiments on real-world and synthetic data.
DOI:
10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10585
AAAI
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 31