Social B(eye)as: Human and Machine Descriptions of People Images

Authors

  • Pınar Barlas Research Centre on Interactive Media, Smart Systems and Emerging Technologies
  • Kyriakos Kyriakou Research Centre on Interactive Media, Smart Systems and Emerging Technologies
  • Styliani Kleanthous Research Centre on Interactive Media, Smart Systems and Emerging Technologies
  • Jahna Otterbacher Research Centre on Interactive Media, Smart Systems and Emerging Technologies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3255

Abstract

Image analysis algorithms have become an indispensable tool in our information ecosystem, facilitating new forms of visual communication and information sharing. At the same time, they enable large-scale socio-technical research which would otherwise be difficult to carry out. However, their outputs may exhibit social bias, especially when analyzing people images. Since most algorithms are proprietary and opaque, we propose a method of auditing their outputs for social biases. To be able to compare how algorithms interpret a controlled set of people images, we collected descriptions across six image tagging algorithms. In order to compare these results to human behavior, we also collected descriptions on the same images from crowdworkers in two anglophone regions. The dataset we present consists of tags from these eight taggers, along with a typology of concepts, and a python script to calculate vector scores for each image and tagger. Using our methodology, researchers can see the behaviors of the image tagging algorithms and compare them to those of crowdworkers. Beyond computer vision auditing, the dataset of humanand machine-produced tags, the typology, and the vectorization method can be used to explore a range of research questions related to both algorithmic and human behaviors.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-06

How to Cite

Barlas, P., Kyriakou, K., Kleanthous, S., & Otterbacher, J. (2019). Social B(eye)as: Human and Machine Descriptions of People Images. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 13(01), 583-591. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3255